MyPromoVideos review
A 3D and industrial specialist — 3D animation, visualisation and virtual tours for manufacturing and logistics clients like Cummins and Addverb — but the FAQ hub that should carry the operational detail carries none of it.
No published price we can link to. We do not estimate one — ask on the call, and see the pricing-transparency line in the scores below.
Verdict
MyPromoVideos occupies a corner of this category that most of it ignores. The work located is 3D animation, motion graphics, 3D visualisation and 3D virtual tours, and the named clients — Falcon Autotech, Accelera by Cummins, Deliverr and Addverb — are automation, logistics and industrial businesses rather than the SaaS and consumer brands that fill everyone else's roster. For a manufacturing or warehouse-automation brief that specialisation is the point: explaining a physical machine is a different job from explaining a dashboard, and an agency whose case studies are full of conveyors and robotics has solved that problem before. The difficulty is that almost nothing operational is published where it should be. The FAQ page is a hub of links to other topics rather than a document that answers anything, and it carries no pricing, no turnaround, no revision policy, no rights statement and no described process. An FAQ that answers no questions is a structural oddity worth noticing: the page a buyer goes to for exactly these answers is the page that has been built to route them elsewhere. There is pricing content on the domain, but it sits in a blog post — a cost guide of the kind flagged in this library's vendor-authored SERP note. That is search content, and a general market range published in a blog is not the same as the agency stating its own rates. It was not scored as pricing transparency, because it is not the agency's price. The formats and the client type carry this to a CONDITIONAL. Everything a buyer needs to compare it — cost, schedule, ownership, how a project runs — has to come out of a conversation. Take that call if the brief involves explaining physical equipment; the 3D and industrial focus is genuinely differentiated, and differentiation is harder to find in this category than transparency.
What we verified
Each claim below was checked against a named source, last on 2026-08-18. Follow any of them and check for yourself — that is the point of publishing them.
- Case-study clients named include Falcon Autotech, Accelera by Cummins, Deliverr and Addverb — an industrial, automation and logistics concentration. mypromovideos.com ↗
- Work shown covers 3D animation, motion graphics, 3D visualisation and 3D virtual tours. mypromovideos.com ↗
- The FAQ page functions as a hub of links to other topics and states no pricing, turnaround, process or rights information itself. mypromovideos.com ↗
What other platforms say
No independent review base located first-hand. Client evidence is self-published case studies in industrial and logistics sectors.
These are other platforms' numbers, not ours. We report them because they are part of the picture, and we do not average them into our score — our score comes from the published rubric above.
Red flags
- The FAQ page answers none of the questions a buyer would arrive there with — no price, no turnaround, no revisions, no rights. It routes to other topics instead. Worth noticing when the page named for answers is built for navigation.
- Cost content on the domain is a general market pricing guide published as a blog post, the pattern recorded in vendor_authored_serp_2026-08-11. It ranks for cost searches without committing the agency to a number.
How it scored
Craft and portfolio evidence
Falcon Autotech, Accelera by Cummins, Deliverr and Addverb named in case studies — a coherent industrial and logistics specialism rather than a generalist roster. Fewer names than the leaders here, and self-published.
Scope and pricing transparency
No agency rates published. A cost guide exists on the domain as a blog post, but a general market range in search content is not the vendor stating its own price and was not scored as such.
Process and project management
No process, approval gates, revision structure or named tooling located. The FAQ page is a hub of links rather than a page that answers the questions.
Format and production range
3D animation, motion graphics, 3D visualisation and 3D virtual tours. Narrow in one sense — no live action evidenced — but the 3D depth is real and rare in this category, and it is the right range for explaining physical equipment.
Rights, ownership and licensing
Nothing located on ownership of source or project files, or on licence duration.
Turnaround and scheduling
No timeline, delivery window or booking lead time located on the pages read.
References and review base
No Clutch or G2 profile, review count or third-party rating located from the pages read.
What we could not verify
- Any agency rate, range or starting figure — the cost content on the domain is a market guide, not a price list
- Any production timeline or booking lead time
- How a project runs, including revision rounds and approval gates
- Who owns source and project files
- Whether any live-action capability exists
- Whether an independent review profile exists
Sources
This agency has not published a paid trial. What a paid trial is.
Others we evaluated in Video Production
Same rubric, same evaluator, same date range — so these are directly comparable to the verdict above.
See all 13 Video Production agencies we evaluated →