SalesHive review
Transparent published pricing and solid deliverability, but recent Clutch complaints (a 13-day wrong-script incident, a litigious refund dispute) are real professionalism red flags. Reference-check hard.
Pricing: $4,000–$12,000 per month Reported — not published by the agency
SalesHive publishes pricing tiers ($4-12k/mo); one client signed at $7k/mo in March 2026. source ↗
Verdict
One of the few shops with publicly listed pricing tiers ($4-12k/mo; one 2026 client at $7k/mo) and a credible deliverability story (>90% inbox placement, lookalike domains, warming). But recent third-party reviews are concerning: one client reports SalesHive used the wrong company name and script for 13 days and booked a single out-of-ICP meeting, and a refund dispute turned litigious. The pricing transparency is genuinely good; the delivery consistency and client-handling are the risk.
What we verified
Each claim below was checked against a named source, last on 2026-07-19. Follow any of them and check for yourself — that is the point of publishing them.
- SalesHive publishes pricing tiers ($4-12k/mo); one client signed at $7k/mo in March 2026. salesso.com ↗
- A Clutch client reports SalesHive used the wrong company name and script for 13 days, yielding one out-of-ICP meeting. clutch.co ↗
- On a refund request, SalesHive refused and threatened steps to protect its financial interests. clutch.co ↗
What other platforms say
Praised for transparent pricing and deliverability mechanics; recent reviews flag execution errors and a litigious refund posture.
These are other platforms' numbers, not ours. We report them because they are part of the picture, and we do not average them into our score — our score comes from the published rubric above.
Red flags
- Documented 13-day wrong-script campaign error
- Litigious response to a refund dispute
- Low public review volume relative to peers
How it scored
Booked-meeting proof
A documented case: wrong script for 13 days, one out-of-ICP meeting. Proof of qualified outcomes is thin/mixed.
Deliverability & infrastructure
>90% inbox placement claimed; lookalike domain deployment and warming protocols.
List sourcing & ICP data
Standard data sourcing; the ICP-mismatch incident suggests targeting QA gaps.
Copy, offer & personalization
Wrong company name/script in a live campaign points to weak copy QA and oversight.
Qualification, booking & handoff
The 13-day error and single out-of-ICP booking indicate weak qualification/handoff.
Who does the work (staffing)
US-positioned SDR team; confirm who runs the account day-to-day.
Pricing, contract & ownership
Published tiers ($4-12k/mo) is a plus; but a refund request was refused and met with legal threats.
Compliance & domain-risk
Standard compliance posture.
What we could not verify
- How representative the negative reviews are vs overall client base
- No-show rates and qualified-meeting definitions
Sources
This agency has not published a paid trial. What a paid trial is.
Others we evaluated in Outbound / Cold Email
Same rubric, same evaluator, same date range — so these are directly comparable to the verdict above.
See all 90 Outbound / Cold Email agencies we evaluated →