KoolavAll agenciesBy industryBy disciplineReportsHow we vet
All agencies · Video Production

Sandwich Video review

CONDITIONAL

Premium launch films at $50,000-$250,000+ on 8-16 week timelines, and among the best in the world at exactly that. Re-scored in its own category it reads as what it is: a specialist commission, not a bad vendor — the earlier CUT was an artifact of judging it on campaign throughput it never claimed.

Pricing: $50,000–$250,000 Reported — not published by the agency
Premium cinematic launch films start at $250,000, with quoted ranges of $50,000-$250,000+ and 8-16 week timelines for enterprise/flagship work. source ↗

Score 3.45/5Confidence: mediumLast evaluated 2026-08-11Website

Verdict

This record is the clearest illustration of why category matters. Scored against a performance-creative rubric, Sandwich Video was CUT at 2.4 — for failing to produce variant sets at volume, which it has never offered and would not want. Scored as a video production agency it reads correctly: a specialist at the top of its craft, with a real and specific set of caveats. The craft is not in dispute. Sandwich produces premium cinematic launch films with a distinctive and recognisable house voice, and a brand commissioning one is buying that voice deliberately rather than shopping for capacity. Price and timeline are publicly discussed — $50,000 to $250,000-plus per film on 8-16 week cycles — which is more disclosure than most houses at this level provide. The caveats are about predictability and terms, not quality. There is no publicly described process or approval structure and no independent review base was located, so a first-time buyer has the work to go on and little else about how the engagement will actually run. Timelines are long by design and booking lead time is unpublished, which for a launch with a fixed date is the risk that matters most. And at this budget, footage ownership and licence terms should be negotiated explicitly rather than assumed. The right read: if the brief is a launch centrepiece and the budget is real, this is a legitimate and serious shortlist entry. If the brief is the sixty pieces of creative that run after the launch, this is the wrong purchase — but that is a statement about the brief, not about the vendor.

What we verified

Each claim below was checked against a named source, last on 2026-08-11. Follow any of them and check for yourself — that is the point of publishing them.

What other platforms say

Recognised for high-craft launch films; explicitly a low-volume, high-budget engagement model.

These are other platforms' numbers, not ours. We report them because they are part of the picture, and we do not average them into our score — our score comes from the published rubric above.

Re-scored on 2026-08-11. This agency previously sat in creative_production_agency, scored against the performance_creative rubric, where it was CUT at 2.4/5. It was scored against a rubric written for a job it was not selling; the verdict above comes from one built for what it does sell.

Red flags

How it scored

Craft and portfolio evidence

Excellent · verified

A recognisable, consistently high-craft body of launch-film work with a distinctive house voice. A brand engaging Sandwich is buying that voice deliberately, which is the strongest form of portfolio evidence there is.

Scope and pricing transparency

Strong · verified

Ranges and timelines are publicly discussed — $50,000-$250,000+ per film, 8-16 weeks — which is more disclosure than most premium production houses offer, even though nothing is fixed.

Process and project management

Adequate · inferred

No publicly described process, tooling or approval structure, and no independent reviewer commentary located to corroborate how engagements run.

Format and production range

Adequate · verified

High-end live-action launch films. Deliberately narrow: one thing, done exceptionally, rather than a range.

Rights, ownership and licensing

Weak · inferred

Footage and project-file ownership and licence terms not stated publicly. At this budget the terms should be negotiated explicitly rather than assumed.

Turnaround and scheduling

Weak · verified

8-16 week timelines, and by construction the agency takes on a small number of engagements — booking lead time is likely the binding constraint and is not published.

References and review base

Weak · inferred

No independent review base located at time of vetting; reputation travels by referral and by the work itself.

What we could not verify

Sources

Visit their website

This agency has not published a paid trial. What a paid trial is.

Others we evaluated in Video Production

Same rubric, same evaluator, same date range — so these are directly comparable to the verdict above.

See all 13 Video Production agencies we evaluated →

Koolav is paid by neither the agencies it evaluates nor by placement. If you believe an evaluation is wrong, we will re-review it and publish the result either way.