All agencies

Brand naming agencies, reviewed and ranked

Firms that name companies and products. Scored on names that verifiably made it into the world, and on the screening that keeps a name alive.

18 evaluated.

A shipped name is public evidence

Naming credits are contested more than any other discipline's — several firms will claim the same famous name, and the client rarely confirms. What survives that is a body of names actually in use by real companies, recent enough that the team that made them is still there. Old glory is the commonest thing sold here.

Screening is most of what you are paying for

Generating candidates is the easy half. The expensive half is killing the ones that are already trademarked, mean something unfortunate in a market you sell into, or cannot clear in the classes you need. A firm that presents unscreened names has moved that work onto you and your lawyers, and you will pay for it later.

Screening is not clearance, and honest firms say so

Nobody in this category can give you legal clearance — that is trademark counsel's job. The firms worth hiring state the boundary plainly and hand off cleanly. Any implication that their own search substitutes for counsel is a warning, not a service.

Ask what happens when every candidate dies

It is a normal outcome for a shortlist to be wiped out in legal review. Find out before contracting how many names come per round, how many rounds are included, and who pays for the next round when the first one clears nothing. Undefined deliverables in a category whose output is a shortlist means buying blind.

Evaluated

Brand Naming18 evaluated

TanjSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 4.2/5
A naming-first NYC consultancy that publishes a quantified four-phase method, a ~$25k starting price and a 6-10 week schedule, and carries 67 verified Clutch reviews at 5.0 - but its two most famous credits, Wii and Bravia, are disclosed as team-members' prior work rather than firm engagements.
River + WolfSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.9/5
A New York naming boutique with 80+ attributed recent names including Versuni and Planteray, a published three-to-six-week timeline and 85 verified Clutch reviews, but no published fees and no stated shortlist size.
NomenSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.85/5
A 1981-founded Paris naming firm with 535 individually attributed name case studies including Clio, Velib' and Enedis, a named linguistic-check method and an in-house trademark practice - but its process, timeline and pricing answers exist only on its French site, not the English one a foreign buyer lands on.
PollywogSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.8/5
A two-principal Minneapolis naming boutique with four names independently confirmed in market and an unusually honest published trademark-screening disclaimer, but no published fees, rounds or timelines on its own site.
Operative WordsSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.75/5
A one-principal naming consultancy whose Accenture, Adobe Lightroom and Yum! Brands credits are confirmed by Fortune independently of the firm, publishing a nine-step process, 100+ screened candidates and an eight-week timeline, but no pricing and no independent client reviews.
HeirloomSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.75/5
A boutique San Francisco naming firm whose published six-step process is unusually candid about where its own trademark screening stops and counsel begins, with three verifiably live names - Xvantage, Ontra and Lineate - but no published fees or timelines.
Wild Geese StudioSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.75/5
A one-principal naming studio with a large recent portfolio -- Docusign IAM, Frida Mom, SeatGeek Unify -- that publishes exact fees for its training products and explicitly sends its shortlist to the client's own counsel, but publishes no naming-project fee, candidate count or round structure.
Lexicon BrandingSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.7/5
Deeply credentialed naming consultancy with independently corroborated in-market names and a documented 100-plus-linguist screening network, but it publishes no fee, no engagement timeline and no shortlist size.
ZinzinSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.65/5
A 2-9 person Berkeley naming boutique with an unusually detailed published method - 48-language linguistic screening, USPTO plus common-law prescreening with an explicit 'not legal clearance' boundary - and 42 verified 5.0 Clutch reviews, but it publishes no fee, no candidate count and no project timeline.
Tungsten BrandingSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.65/5
A 25-year naming specialist that publishes its own fee range ($25,000-$35,000 typical), 50+ named case studies and 70 verified Clutch reviews, but never states how many candidate names, how many rounds, or whether cross-market linguistic screening is in scope.
A Hundred MonkeysSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.55/5
A 35-year-old Berkeley naming-only studio of six with 400+ shipped names and the most explicitly documented trademark screening process in the category - graded A-F by an outside IP attorney, with legal clearance openly left to the client's counsel - but it publishes no fees and no project timelines at all.
Brighter NamingSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.55/5
A 2002-founded solo-principal naming firm that publishes an unusually concrete process - 400+ candidates narrowed to 3, with named linguistics and trademark steps - but no engagement pricing, no client-confirmed naming credits, and an independent review base of two reviews from 2014.
Eat My WordsSTRONG FIT
Brand Naming · 3.5/5
A one-founder-led naming specialist with roughly 180 published names, many verifiably in market, and rare published price bands ($15,000-$49,000 full service, $6,000 and below for micro-businesses) -- but no independent reviews anywhere and no described cross-market linguistic screening.
The Naming GroupCONDITIONAL
Brand Naming · 3.35/5
A naming-only consultancy of six with a published four-phase method, native-speaker linguistic screening and in-house trademark counsel, whose names are checkable in market -- but which publishes no fee, no timeline and no shortlist size.
Brand InstituteCONDITIONAL
Brand Naming · 3.2/5
A 1993-founded pharmaceutical naming specialist with an unusually deep regulatory layer - ex-FDA/EMA officials, POCA name-safety screening and published 2025 approval rates by jurisdiction - but it publishes no fees, no timelines and no shortlist size.
NamebaseCONDITIONAL
Brand Naming · 3.2/5
Boutique naming firm publishing unusually concrete deliverables - two rounds, hundreds of names, 3-6 weeks - behind roughly 60 self-attributed client names, but no pricing, no described multi-market linguistic screening, and no dated activity on its own site since 2018.
NameStormersCONDITIONAL
Brand Naming · 3.15/5
Austin naming firm operating since 1985 with a published seven-stage process, a stated 10-20 name shortlist and 84 Clutch reviews, but no published fees, no engagement timeline and no client-confirmed naming credits.
IgorCONDITIONAL
Brand Naming · 3.0/5
A 2002-founded Sausalito naming consultancy with ~50 attributed in-market names, a published four-stage method and 46 verified Clutch reviews, but no published fees, timelines, round structure or linguistic screening.
How this page is built: every vendor here is scored against the published brand_naming rubric — the one written for what this category actually sells, not a general agency rubric. Several of these records were first filed elsewhere and scored against a rubric they were not competing in; where that happened, the record carries a rescored_from field showing the previous verdict and score, so the change is auditable rather than silent.